In twenty years or so, the Internet has moved from office
computer work tool and entertainment center to utter ubiquity. Mobile apps and network connections are
everywhere. Your networked refrigerator can text your smart phone and remind
you that you are out of ice cream. It won’t be long before your cat can send
you a popup empty bowl gif rather than rubbing your leg and meowing
obnoxiously. Important news about community events come in through texts and
posting.
So when something about as important as the blood stream is
changed in a fundamental way, people should pay attention. This is an economics, finance and investment
blog, so a thorough discussion of the issue is beyond our scope. But if you do
not want to see the Internet turn in to cable television with tier pricing,
limited options and lack of the information that YOU want to use, keep reading.
MOVING TO PAY TO PLAY. AND WE KNOW WHO WILL HAVE TO PAY
In 2015 the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) defined
the Internet as a “common carrier.” This treated the Internet as a “common
carrier,” and effectively requires that Internet Service Providers (ISP) treat
all content them same. They cannot block content nor charge more for certain
content.
So under a Net Neutrality model, content providers compete
based upon the content they provide, rather than paying bounties to ISPs for faster
service delivery.
So a new video streaming service will have the same
opportunity for failure or success as a service owned by an ISP. By way of example, in 2005 YouTube was
startup company in competition with Google Video. Under Net Neutrality
principles, Google Video was not permitted to pay ISPs for faster downloads and
less latency. This allowed YouTube to succeed in the market based upon consumer
desires.
THE DECEMBER DECISION
The 2015 rule defining the Internet as a common carrier
provided Net Neutrality. But in December of last year, the FCC voted, by a 3-2,
party line vote, to end Net Neutrality.
They did this by changing the legal definition of the Internet from a
common carrier to that of an “Information Service” and weakening content
protection. The chairman of the FCC, a Trump appointee, was formerly counsel
for Verizon, led the effort to repeal Net Neutrality.
Several states Attorney Generals have sued the FCC to
overturn the rules.
THE LONG GAME
Very little will change in the near term. But unless Net Neutrality
is reinstated, the Internet may soon resemble Cable TV. 400 Channels and nothing
worth watching.
YOUR HIGHTLIGHTS FROM THE DESERT OF THE REAL!
No comments:
Post a Comment